Suspension of Funds to USAID: Trump Suffers Legal Defeat
NEW DELHI, Mar 5: A divided U.S. Supreme Court on Wednesday handed a legal defeat to the President Donald Trump rejecting his bid to freeze some $ two billions in foreign aid payments.
The Court, in its first significant ruling on a legal challenge to the Trump administration, voted 5-4 to uphold a lower court order requiring that payments be made on aid contracts that have already been completed.
The justices said the federal judge who ordered the resumption of payments for the contracts with the US Agency for International Development (USAID) and State Department “should clarify what obligations the Government must fulfill.”
Conservatives John Roberts, the chief justice, and Amy Coney Barrett, a Trump appointee, voted with the three liberal justices on the nine-member Supreme Court. Judge Samuel Alito wrote a dissent that was joined by the three other conservative justices.
“Does a single district-court judge who likely lacks jurisdiction have the unchecked power to compel the Government of the United States to pay out (and probably lose forever) 2 billion taxpayer dollars?” Mr Alito wrote. “The answer to that question should be an emphatic ‘No,’ but a majority of this Court apparently thinks otherwise. I am stunned,” he said.
District Judge Amir Ali, an appointee of former President Joe Biden, issued a temporary restraining order last month prohibiting the Trump administration from “suspending, pausing, or otherwise preventing” foreign assistance funds. Mr Trump has launched a campaign led by his top donor Elon Musk, the world’s richest person, to downsize or dismantle swaths of the U.S. government.
The most concentrated fire has been on USAID, the primary organization for distributing U.S. humanitarian aid around the world with health and emergency programs in around 120 countries. Mr Trump has said USAID was “run by radical lunatics” and Mr Musk has described it as a “criminal organization” needing to be put “through the woodchipper.”
(Manas Dasgupta)
