Is WHO Team Studying Origin of Coronavirus Facing “Political Pressure?”
Manas Dasgupta
NEW DELHI, Mar 18: Will the world ever learn the truth about the origin of the novel Coronavirus. From the contradictory reports coming from the world team of experts appointed by the World Health Organisation and the team of scientists of China assisting the world team, it is highly unlikely that ultimately truth will prevail.
Both the sides are talking about “pressures” before the reports are finalized while the Chinese team was specifically accusing some “politicians and international media” to be pressurizing for twisting scientific facts for their “own personal gains.”
The head of the WHO team working with Chinese colleagues to finish a long-awaited report into the origins of the coronavirus acknowledged its authors could face “pressures” but insisted the final product will have a unanimous green light from all of the team’s science-minded members.
Peter Ben Embarek, an expert on food safety and diseases that jump from animals to humans, said the team hopes the report — now totaling some 280 pages and complete with graphs, dates and annexes — will be ready for release next week.
The report is a first-phase study that is expected to be followed by a more in-depth look as part of guidelines set by Chinese officials and the WHO team.
Ben Embarek, who led a 10-person international team of experts that visited China in January and February, acknowledged that political pressures have loomed large over the virus pandemic.
“We are in the world that we live in,” he said. “It’s possible that there will be pressures from right to left.”
What we can guarantee is that everyone will be on board” and “unanimous” in their backing of the report once that the text is completed, Ben Embarek said. The “fine-tuning of the text” has centered on scientific issues, while some Chinese-English translation issues were “taking a lot of time,” he said.
He said the report was being written by all of the experts and is part of a “long and complex” process.
Embarek stopped short of claiming if the report, though may be unanimous, would give out the whole truth withstanding “political pressures” he talked about.
On China’s side, its official media on Wednesday published an interview with Liang Wannian, the head of the Chinese side of the team, who spoke of alleged “political pressures” that amounted to “huge disrespect to the work of our scientists.”
Liang was quoted as saying some politicians and international media had “insisted on politicizing the scientific issue of tracing the source of COVID-19, regardless of scientific facts, for their own personal gain, arbitrarily misinterpreting the scientific findings and reports of our joint team.”
He took pains to emphasize the spirit of cooperation among the scientists and said both sides had cooperated openly and fully throughout the month-long investigation, and that “results of this joint study in China are the consensus of Chinese and foreign experts.”
Liang echoed the comments from Ben Embarek about the extended time to publish the report, saying the process required to present a complete and scientifically rigorous report “takes some time.”
The team did not find cases of COVID-19 before December 8, 2019, he claimed.
Ben Embarek cited the need to investigate the possible role in the pandemic of the local trade in wild animal products from farms in and around southern China in 2019 and beyond to a market in the city of Wuhan, which could have been a way that the virus entered a large city that was tied into global supply chains.
“We don’t know yet the origins of the pandemic,” he said, adding that cold-chain transmission, including through frozen food packaging, was a “possible route” of spread, but that the issue requires further exploration.
Liang promoted Chinese government claims of other sources of the pandemic saying that cold chain transmission “plays an important part in the origin and transmission of the epidemic.” The international team left open the possibility of the cold chain playing a role in the transmission.
It took many months for the U.N. team to arrange a visit to China with Chinese authorities. Critics say the delay cost valuable time in efforts to unearth the origins of the pandemic, which has led to at least 2.6 million reported deaths.
Last week, Chen Xu, the Chinese ambassador to U.N. organizations in Geneva, said the WHO had selected the team’s members who did the work with Chinese counterparts, appearing to suggest no political influence by China was exerted.
“We have our hands off, like the officials from the WHO as well,” Chen said, alluding to the U.N. agency’s secretariat. “Let the scientists (do) their work.”
China’s government detained some doctors who sought to raise the alarm about the outbreak, which is believed to have originated in or near Wuhan in late 2019.
WHO repeatedly praised the Chinese government’s early response, even though recordings of private meetings obtained by a section of the media exposed how top officials at the U.N. health agency were frustrated at China’s lack of cooperation.
