Site icon Revoi.in

India – China Stress Need to Find Early Solutions to Border Disputes, China Constructs Second Enclave in Arunachal Pradesh

Social Share

NEW DELHI, Nov 18: Even as both India and China have hardened their stands making no headway in some of the border disputes in the 13 rounds of talks at different levels between the two countries, the diplomats from the two countries agreed on Thursday on the “need to find an early resolution to the remaining issues along the LAC in Eastern Ladakh while fully abiding by bilateral agreements and protocols so as to restore peace and tranquility”.

An official statement by the Ministry of External Affairs, after the 23rd meeting of the Working Mechanism for Consultation & Coordination on India-China Border Affairs (WMCC), said, “The two sides also agreed that both sides should in the interim also continue to ensure a stable ground situation and avoid any untoward incident.”

The MEA statement said the two sides recalled the agreement between External Affairs Minister S Jaishankar and the Foreign Minister of China Wang Yi during their meeting in September in Dushanbe that military and diplomatic officials should continue their discussions to resolve the remaining issues along the LAC in Eastern Ladakh.

“Accordingly, the two sides had candid and in-depth discussions on the situation along the LAC in Western Sector of India-China Border Areas and also reviewed the developments since the last meeting of the Senior Commanders of both sides which was held on 10th October 2021,” the statement said.

The Indian delegation was led by Additional Secretary (East Asia) from the Ministry of External Affairs. The Director General of the Boundary & Oceanic Department of the Chinese Ministry of Foreign Affairs led the Chinese delegation.

The statement said, “it was agreed that both sides should hold the next (14th) round of the Senior Commanders meeting at an early date to achieve the objective of complete disengagement from all the friction points along the LAC in the Western Sector in accordance with the existing bilateral agreements and protocols”.

A year-and-a-half into the military standoff on the LAC in eastern Ladakh, India and China had hardened their positions last month on October 10 after making no headway in the 13th round of Corps Commander-level talks to try and resolve the situation at Hot Springs.

On October 11, a day after the talks at the Moldo border personnel meeting point near Chushul, India and China, in their sharpest exchange since the Galwan Valley clash in June 2020 and stepped-up diplomatic efforts thereafter to reach a negotiated solution, blamed each other for the failure to make progress over Hot Springs.

Troops have disengaged on the north and south banks of Pangong Tso and Gogra Post, but not at Hot Springs, where they continue to face each other ever since the Chinese crossed the LAC in May 2020. The Chinese have also been preventing Indian troops from accessing traditional patrolling points on the Depsang Plains, not far from the strategic Indian outpost at Daulat Beg Oldie near the Karakoram Pass in the north.

Meanwhile, new satellite images show that China has constructed a second enclave or cluster of at least 60 buildings in Arunachal Pradesh. The new enclave did not exist in 2019 according to the satellite images; a year later, it can be seen. It lies 93 km east of a China-constructed village in Arunachal Pradesh, a big encroachment reported in January and which was confirmed by a Pentagon report just days ago. India reacted sharply to that report stating that ”China has undertaken construction activities in the past several years along the border areas, including in the areas that it has illegally occupied over the decades. India has neither accepted such illegal occupation of our territory, nor has it accepted the unjustified Chinese claims.”

The second enclave lies approximately six kilometres within India in the region between the Line of Actual Control (LAC) and the International Boundary. India has always claimed this as its own territory. The images do not offer any clarity on whether the enclave is occupied.

(Manas Dasgupta)